Discovery and case preparation often require extensive attorney effort and periodic judicial review. The discovery process probably constitutes the most time-consuming, costly aspect of litigation. The Judicial Arbiter Group, Inc. can assist counsel in the discovery process in two ways, either by being appointed as a Special Master by the Court currently having jurisdiction in the pending litigation or by the parties entering into an Agreement to Arbitrate which covers all discovery matters or selected issues. The Judicial Arbiter Group is able to assist counsel in managing discovery efforts in several ways including:

Day to Day Supervision of Discovery
An assigned arbiter is able to provide prompt resolution of scheduled conflicts regarding discovery disputes, and generally be available on short notice to resolve questions that arise.

The arbiter can provide continuity and supervision in the timing of discovery and promote smooth, sequential discovery responses.

Prompt Hearings on Motions to Compel or Sanction
Using the Judicial Arbiter Group enables counsel to obtain prompt resolution, by hearing, of discovery disputes including Motions to Compel and Motions for Sanctions. This availability allows counsel to resume the discovery process more quickly.

Development of Discovery Master Plan
One method used to provide a speedy and economical resolution of litigation is to develop a Master Discovery Plan. This document, drafted by counsel for all parties, with assistance from a JAG arbiter, establishes the framework for a simplified, timely and economic discovery process early in the case. It reduces or eliminates duplications, controls

While evidence and witnesses may be presented in both an oral and written format and summarized for brevity, jury members receive information just as in a public court trial. Both trial presentation of counsel and jury deliberation can be videotaped for later review and study. Upon conclusion of the trial, counsel can view jury deliberations simultaneously as they occur to experience more fully the dynamics of jury deliberations.

While the use of these techniques often involves only one party to specific litigation, opposing counsel involved in cases can participate in such programs, even agreeing that any verdict produced in this format would be binding.